Comentários e feedback de alunos de Sequence Models da instituição deeplearning.ai

The videos are good, however the assignments are too long with sooooo many text inside. You have to make it more efficient somehow.

But thank you anyway for the great content!

Assignments in this course are relatively less organized. You have to read a lot of description first and then code and have to go back/forth between code and description.

I believe that the course needs more time allocated to the incremental teaching of this rather large subject area with varied applications. Just needs to be a better way.

The course was especially interesting in week 2 and 3, but the assignments for week 1 were confusing and sometimes it was hard to follow where the logic was coming from.

This was the most difficult to understand course in the whole specialization. Would have enjoyed more if the course material was a little more spaced and elaborated on.

The first week is amazing. The last week is the worst! Andrew starts nicely; but as he goes to the second and third weeks, he hardly explains why he does what he does.

Practical Assignments with Keras wasn't motivating. I spend more time to deep into the Keras rather than into the course topic. I prefer them to be using TF or Python.

The supports in keras programming was so poor, that I could not quite understand each step. And the server was horrible, always got 405 response when saving my codes.

This course should be broken into 4 weeks and spend more time building skills with Keras. The number of hours listed next to each assignment is unrealistically low.

The lecture was great but the errors in the programming assignment (especially in formal-typed formulas) really wasted a lot of time and make me confusing at first.

The ideas presented here were clear, however I found the programming assignments non-intuitive and not practical. I spent on them way more time than I wish i had.

I enjoyed all the courses, from my personal point of view this course was not that fun as the other courses. Except for the trigger assignment it was awesome!

Too much was given in external python code for the first week's assignment (that should be learnt by us): not a good thing for us to gain a good understanding

Worst course of the specialization, content is interesting and Andrew keeps explaining really well but programming assignments are clearly of a lower quality

The course is great but the tasks in Keras are too complex without background knowledge. Therefore, a reasonable introduction in Keras would be desirable.

Far less detailed than the other ones. The programming assignements are less interesting too, as a great part of the work consist of reading documentation

There were lot of bugs in the assignments taking up lot of time to fix. The course was okay, I liked the other courses in the specialization more.

The Keras programming exercises are quite weak. Please re-think how to teach them more systematically. Currently it is quite a lot of hit and miss.

That was much harder than the previous courses of the specialization. However it felt like the videos are more hasty and less understoodable

There was a bug in a programming assignment notebook that took too much time to notice that i was doing ok but the expected ouptut was wrong

The programming assignments required some extra effort to understand Keras which I thought may need an introduction video like tensorflow.

Several grader issues, only 3 weeks of work, and a lot of errors in the solutions... In addition, less content than in the other courses...

The earlier courses were easy to understand, however, this was way too difficult. Andrew Ng did not make this easy like the other courses.

Compared with previous courses, this one seems to be rushed. The focus on applications seems to be much higher than the theoretic side.

Not as great as the other courses in the specialisation. The assignments can be a little off putting, but lectures are top class again.