Informações sobre o curso
4.7
50 classificações
12 avaliações
100% online

100% online

Comece imediatamente e aprenda em seu próprio cronograma.
Prazos flexíveis

Prazos flexíveis

Redefinir os prazos de acordo com sua programação.
Nível iniciante

Nível iniciante

Horas para completar

Aprox. 8 horas para completar

Sugerido: 3 weeks of study, 3 levels of commitment: Learn (1.5h/week), Engage (3h/week), Go Further (3+h/week)...
Idiomas disponíveis

Inglês

Legendas: Inglês
100% online

100% online

Comece imediatamente e aprenda em seu próprio cronograma.
Prazos flexíveis

Prazos flexíveis

Redefinir os prazos de acordo com sua programação.
Nível iniciante

Nível iniciante

Horas para completar

Aprox. 8 horas para completar

Sugerido: 3 weeks of study, 3 levels of commitment: Learn (1.5h/week), Engage (3h/week), Go Further (3+h/week)...
Idiomas disponíveis

Inglês

Legendas: Inglês

Programa - O que você aprenderá com este curso

Semana
1
Horas para completar
26 minutos para concluir

GETTING STARTED

...
Reading
1 vídeo (total de (Total 1 mín.) min), 3 leituras
Reading3 leituras
About this course5min
Course assessments and exercises5min
Optional companion book5min
Horas para completar
4 horas para concluir

SHOULD YOU BELIEVE WHAT PEOPLE SAY?

Professor Peter Graham points out that a great deal of what we know, we know because other people told us. But can we always believe them? Should we be trusting, or sceptical? The truth lies somewhere in the middle. This lecture will offer you some guidelines on how to find it, and on how to avoid the pitfalls created by our fears, biases, and over-confidence....
Reading
8 vídeos (total de (Total 51 mín.) min), 8 leituras, 6 testes
Video8 videos
Introduction to testimony4min
Trust and scepticism6min
The evolutionary background of trust11min
Reconciling testimony with what we already believe3min
The right, the wrong, and the humble6min
Humility, fear and bias10min
Humility and confidence6min
Reading8 leituras
Before you begin...10min
"Can You Believe What You Hear?" by Ian Church & Peter Samuelson (recommended)10min
Jennifer Saul on Implicit Bias (recommended podcast)3min
Daniel Kahneman on Bias (recommended)5min
"Social Knowledge and Social Norms" by Peter Graham (further reading)15min
"Knowledge, Assertion and Humility" by Emma C. Gordon and J. Adam Carter (further reading)10min
Miranda Fricker on Epistemic Injustice (further podcast)10min
"On Testimony and Transmission" by J. Adam Carter and Philip J. Nickel (further reading)10min
Quiz6 exercícios práticos
Initial thoughts2min
Practice Quiz6min
Feels good to be right?10min
Your examples of fears and biases15min
Module quiz20min
Reading quiz on "Can You Believe What You Hear?" by Ian Church and Peter Samuelson6min
Semana
2
Horas para completar
4 horas para concluir

HOW SHOULD WE HANDLE DISAGREEMENT?

Resolving disagreements may seem easy when one person clearly knows more about the topic of disagreement than the other. But what about cases where both parties are equally knowledgable and capable - in other words, when they are intellectual equals? Professor Catherine Elgin discusses various strategies we can adopt, and helps us understand how people who have the same evidence and reasoning ability can still disagree....
Reading
4 vídeos (total de (Total 29 mín.) min), 7 leituras, 7 testes
Video4 videos
Introduction to disagreement5min
Disagreement between equals10min
Dimensions of reasonable disagreement11min
Reading7 leituras
"How Should We Handle Disagreement?" by Ian Church & Peter Samuelson (recommended)10min
"The Epistemic Significance of Disagreement" by Thomas Kelly (recommended)15min
"Reasonable Disagreement" by Catherine Elgin (further reading)10min
"The Epistemology of Testimony" by Duncan Pritchard (further reading)10min
"Philosophical Peer Disagreement" by Nicolás Lo Guercio (further reading)10min
"The Epistemology of Disagreement" (video discussion between Roy Sorensen and David Christensen).5min
"Intellectual Humility, Knowledge-How and Disagreement" by Duncan Pritchard and J. Adam Carter (further reading)10min
Quiz7 exercícios práticos
Your initial thoughts10min
Practice Quiz4min
Back to last week5min
The disagreements you know15min
The dimensions in your example10min
Module quiz16min
Reading quiz on "How Should We Handle Disagreement?" by Ian Church and Peter Samuelson6min
Semana
3
Horas para completar
3 horas para concluir

RESOLVING RELIGIOUS DISAGEEMENTS: THE ROLE OF EVIDENCE

Dr Katherine Dormandy explains why religious disagreements are so often particularly hard to resolve. Distinguishing between two types of evidence one can have in religious discussions - public and private - she evaluates three Evidence Weighting Policies we can use in determining how to approach others when talking about religion. ...
Reading
8 vídeos (total de (Total 45 mín.) min), 5 leituras, 6 testes
Video8 videos
Introduction5min
Biases and evidence-weighting9min
Three evidence-weighting policies5min
Assessing privatism6min
Assessing publicism4min
Assessing egalitarianism4min
Improving egalitarianism9min
Reading5 leituras
"What Does Intellectual Humility Tell Us About Religion?" by Ian Church & Peter Samuelson (recommended)10min
"Faith and Reason" by Duncan Pritchard (recommended reading or viewing)10min
"Two Concepts of Intellectual Humility" by Jason Baehr (further viewing)5min
"Can There Be Religious Disagreement Between Epistemic Peers?" by Jennifer Lackey (further viewing)3min
"Scepticism and Implicit Bias" by Jennifer Saul (further reading)10min
Quiz6 exercícios práticos
Initial thoughts2min
Good disagreement10min
Practice Quiz6min
Evidence weighting in disagreement20min
Module Quiz20min
Reading quiz on "What Does Intellectual Humility Tell Us About Religion?" by Ian Church & Peter Samuelson6min
Semana
4
Horas para completar
3 horas para concluir

END OF COURSE ASSIGNMENTS

...
Reading
5 leituras, 1 teste
Reading5 leituras
Before you finish...5min
Show what you learned by editing the Wikipedia entry on intellectual humility!30min
A brief How-To10min
TRAILER: Intellectual Humility: Theory5min
TRAILER: Intellectual Humility: Science5min
4.7
12 avaliaçõesChevron Right

Melhores avaliações

por MPDec 12th 2017

Informative, well structured, and clearly presented material.

por DBDec 28th 2017

Excellent and straightforward. Meaty and digestible.

Instrutores

Avatar

Dr. Ian Church

Researcher
Epistemology; Philosophy of Psychology; Philosophy of Religion
Avatar

Professor Duncan Pritchard

Professor of Philosophy
University of Edinburgh
Avatar

Dr. Emma Gordon

Postdoctoral Researcher
University of Edinburgh

Sobre The University of Edinburgh

Influencing the world since 1583, The University of Edinburgh is consistently ranked as one of the world's top 50 universities. Today, we are an established and global leader in online learning, providing degree-level education to 3,000 online students in addition to 36,000 students on-campus. We also offer a wide range of free online courses in a variety of subjects. To find out more about studying for one of our online degrees, search for ‘Edinburgh online’ or visit www.ed.ac.uk/studying/online-learning/postgraduate ...

Perguntas Frequentes – FAQ

  • Ao se inscrever para um Certificado, você terá acesso a todos os vídeos, testes e tarefas de programação (se aplicável). Tarefas avaliadas pelos colegas apenas podem ser enviadas e avaliadas após o início da sessão. Caso escolha explorar o curso sem adquiri-lo, talvez você não consiga acessar certas tarefas.

  • Quando você adquire o Certificado, ganha acesso a todo o material do curso, incluindo avaliações com nota atribuída. Após concluir o curso, seu Certificado eletrônico será adicionado à sua página de Participações e você poderá imprimi-lo ou adicioná-lo ao seu perfil no LinkedIn. Se quiser apenas ler e assistir o conteúdo do curso, você poderá frequentá-lo como ouvinte sem custo.

Mais dúvidas? Visite o Central de Ajuda ao Aprendiz.