Its my 4th course of this specialization. Unlike previous 3 courses I found myself struggling to focus on this course because the content was more focused on video lectures and less practical problems.

Poor video material, much talk about many situations inside systems, but not much coding, and no clear pedagogic path. The second and 4th qwiklabs were great though, challenging and fun.

Codes are not well explained. Modules and codes were just coming from here and there. It just made me alienated in this course. But for the part of theory explanation, it was good.

This Course is more Theoretical instead it should make more focus on Practical learning which would overall benefit the students or learners like me.

Pretty basics stuff, maybe I was just expecting more challenging content.

The instructor is pretty good, easy to understand.

I wish to reduce theoretical concepts and repetitive ones , and put more practical exercises

Thank you, Amanda

This is the most course I didn't like at all and skipped it because of the instructor

the course focus on IT more than debugging techniques in Python it self

Very simple. The obvious things are told.

Almost unnecessary. Nothing usible

Sorry but I say no

A but dragging

Me estaba encantado este curso, estaba aprendiendo muchisimo a lo largo de los 3 primeros módulos, pero en este todo lo contrario, he odiado cada minuto de este curso, la chica que lo imparte se ve que tiene muchos conocimientos, pero solo habla habla y habla de todos los supuestos motivos de cada uno de los herrores que va comentando, (que son muchisimos) pero no se centra en nada. No se puede sacar absolutamente nada de este módulo. Esto sumado a que a la gran mayoría de los videos les faltan los subtítulos en otros idiomas, lo hacen todo aún más dificil.

Course was extremley buggy, although I had watched all of the videos, none of them had been marked, in addition to this, my quickilabs assignments had given me wrong usernames on occasion and I would had to restart the lab. Also in addition to the quickilabs problems, my code would work perfectly half of the time, and then just completely break the next and it was extremely unpredictable.

The labs seemed to be either very basic or very challenging to the point you were not set up very well. The hard ones were where she just went very quickly on how to do it, just did it instead of teaching it. Also, many of the videos were just common sense and she would continue talking on similar concepts.

Applicable mostly to Linux Systems, with a rare mention of Windows here and there. I installed WSL Ubuntu on my system and managed to keep up. It's not for everyone. The instructor was really good, very clear and explained everything well.

there was an error, i completed the lab and i got the number in week 1 while i checked it for my progress completion it said error,now i have no quota to proceed my lab now i won't get my it automation certificate..any help team

Terrible.

The quiz in chapter 1 is not covered in any of the videos I watched. You need to not just under python but be able to write the code in order to answer the questions.

First Course in the automation specialization, where I can tell I did not get any new knowledge of it. Just completed it in order to proceed in the whole specialization.

I didn't like this course ! I felt like it was too technical and didn't offer enough solutions to problems, especially in the final lab.

There is a dead link in the final project, the csv file that needs to be processed. WIthout this file, the course cannot be completed.

The instructor was superb and I enjoyed her delivery. The labs and quizzes leave a lot of room for improvement.

The course focuses more on debugging on Linux systems.

The course contains basic troubleshooting techniques.

it does not meet my expactation.this is the worst course i have ever seen

Vague course, I don't think the instructor knew much about programming.