Informações sobre o curso
4.6
3,082 classificações
731 avaliações
100% online

100% online

Comece imediatamente e aprenda em seu próprio cronograma.
Prazos flexíveis

Prazos flexíveis

Redefinir os prazos de acordo com sua programação.
Horas para completar

Aprox. 14 horas para completar

Sugerido: 4 hours/week...
Idiomas disponíveis

Inglês

Legendas: Inglês, Chinês (simplificado), Vietnamita, Holandês, Turco, Hebraico, Espanhol, Romeno...
100% online

100% online

Comece imediatamente e aprenda em seu próprio cronograma.
Prazos flexíveis

Prazos flexíveis

Redefinir os prazos de acordo com sua programação.
Horas para completar

Aprox. 14 horas para completar

Sugerido: 4 hours/week...
Idiomas disponíveis

Inglês

Legendas: Inglês, Chinês (simplificado), Vietnamita, Holandês, Turco, Hebraico, Espanhol, Romeno...

Programa - O que você aprenderá com este curso

Semana
1
Horas para completar
2 horas para concluir

What is Philosophy?

(Dr. Dave Ward) We’ll start the course by thinking about what Philosophy actually is: what makes it different from other subjects? What are its distinctive aims and methods? We'll also think about why the questions that philosophers attempt to answer are often thought to be both fundamental and important, and have a look at how philosophy is actually practiced. Finally, we'll briefly touch upon two very influential philosophers' answers to the question of how we can know whether, in any given case, there really is a right way of thinking about things....
Reading
4 vídeos (Total de 47 min), 3 leituras, 2 testes
Video4 videos
Philosophy: Difficult, Important and Everywhere11min
Philosophy: How Do We Do It?17min
Is There A 'Right Way' To Think About Things?6min
Reading3 leituras
About this Course10min
Module: What is Philosophy?10min
Optional Reading10min
Quiz2 exercícios práticos
Practice: What is Philosophy?8min
What is Philosophy?10min
Semana
2
Horas para completar
1 hora para concluir

Morality: Objective, Relative or Emotive?

(Dr. Matthew Chrisman) We all live with some sense of what is good or bad, some feelings about which ways of conducting ourselves are better or worse. But what is the status of these moral beliefs, senses, or feelings? Should we think of them as reflecting hard, objective facts about our world, of the sort that scientists could uncover and study? Or should we think of moral judgements as mere expressions of personal or cultural preferences? In this module we’ll survey some of the different options that are available when we’re thinking about these issues, and the problems and prospects for each....
Reading
4 vídeos (Total de 44 min), 2 leituras, 1 teste
Video4 videos
Objectivism, Relativism and Emotivism13min
Objections to Objectivism, Relativism and Emotivism11min
Further Discussion7min
Reading2 leituras
Module: Morality: Objective, Emotive or Relative?10min
Related work by Philosophy staff at the University of Edinburgh10min
Quiz1 exercício prático
Practice: Morality: Objective, Relative or Emotive?12min
Horas para completar
1 hora para concluir

What is Knowledge? And Do We Have Any?

(Professor Duncan Pritchard) We know a lot of things – or, at least, we think we do. Epistemology is the branch of philosophy that studies knowledge; what it is, and the ways we can come to have it. In this module, we’ll take a tour through some of the issues that arise in this branch of philosophy. In particular, we’ll think about what radical scepticism means for our claims to knowledge. How can we know something is the case if we’re unable to rule out possibilities that are clearly incompatible with it? ...
Reading
5 vídeos (Total de 56 min), 2 leituras, 1 teste
Video5 videos
The Classical Account of Knowledge and the Gettier Problem18min
Do We Have Any Knowledge?10min
Further Discussion 110min
Further Discussion 23min
Reading2 leituras
Module: What is Knowledge? And Do We Have Any?10min
Related work by Philosophy staff at the University of Edinburgh10min
Quiz1 exercício prático
Practice: What is Knowledge? And Do We Have Any?12min
Horas para completar
24 minutos para concluir

Week 2 review

...
Reading
1 teste
Quiz2 exercícios práticos
Morality: Objective, Relative or Emotive?20min
What is Knowledge? And Do We Have Any?24min
Semana
3
Horas para completar
1 hora para concluir

Do We Have an Obligation to Obey the Law?

(Dr. Guy Fletcher) The laws of a state govern what we can and cannot do within that state. But do we have an obligation to obey those laws? In this module, we'll discuss this question, together with some of the main positions that philosophers have developed in response to it. We'll start off by examining what obeying the law means exactly. Then we'll look at three factors that might form the basis of an obligation to follow the law. Finally, we'll discuss what the consequences might be if the problem can't be solved....
Reading
7 vídeos (Total de 27 min), 2 leituras, 1 teste
Video7 videos
The Grounds of Political Obligation2min
Gratitude and Benefit4min
Consent8min
Fairness3min
What if the Problem Can't Be Solved?1min
Summary1min
Reading2 leituras
Module: Do We Have an Obligation to Obey the Law?10min
Related work by Philosophy staff at the University of Edinburgh10min
Quiz1 exercício prático
Practice: Do We Have an Obligation to Obey the Law?20min
Horas para completar
1 hora para concluir

Should You Believe What You Hear?

(Dr. Allan Hazlett) Much of what we think about the world we believe on the basis of what other people say. But is this trust in other people's testimony justified? In this module, we’ll investigate how this question was addressed by two great philosophers of the Scottish Enlightenment, David Hume (1711 - 1776) and Thomas Reid (1710 - 1796). Hume and Reid's dispute about testimony represents a clash between two worldviews that would continue to clash for centuries: a skeptical and often secular worldview, eager to question everything (represented by Hume), and a conservative and often religious worldview, keen to defend common sense (represented by Reid). ...
Reading
5 vídeos (Total de 25 min), 2 leituras, 1 teste
Video5 videos
Reid's Challenge to Hume2min
Reid's Argument5min
Kant, the Enlightenment and Intellectual Autonomy4min
The Value of Intellectual Autonomy3min
Reading2 leituras
Module: Should You Believe What You Hear?10min
Related work by Philosophy staff at the University of Edinburgh10min
Quiz1 exercício prático
Practice: Should You Believe What You Hear?8min
Horas para completar
20 minutos para concluir

Week 3 review

...
Reading
1 teste
Quiz2 exercícios práticos
Do We Have an Obligation to Obey the Law?20min
Should You Believe What You Hear?20min
Semana
4
Horas para completar
2 horas para concluir

Minds, Brains and Computers

(Dr. Suilin Lavelle) If you’re reading this, then you’ve got a mind. But what is a mind, and what does it take to have one? Should we understand minds as sets of dispositions to behave in certain ways, as patterns of neural activation, or as akin to programmes that are run on the computational hardware of our brains? In this module, we’ll look at how and why recent philosophy of mind and psychology has embraced each of these options in turn, and think about the problems and prospects for each. ...
Reading
7 vídeos (Total de 57 min), 2 leituras, 1 teste
Video7 videos
Physicalism: Identity Theory and Functionalism13min
Functionalism and What Mental States Do8min
Functionalism and Functional Complexity4min
Minds vs. Machines: The Turing Test and the Chinese Room11min
Minds vs. Machines: Problems for the Computational View of the Mind4min
Further Discussion4min
Reading2 leituras
Module: Mind, Brains and Computers10min
Related work by Philosophy staff at the University of Edinburgh10min
Quiz1 exercício prático
Practice: Minds, Brains and Computers24min
Horas para completar
1 hora para concluir

Are Scientific Theories True?

(Professor Michela Massimi) In this module we will explore a central and ongoing debate in contemporary philosophy of science: whether or not scientific theories are true. Or better, whether a scientific theory needs to be 'true' to be good at all. The answer to this question comes in two main varieties. Scientific realists believe that theories ought to be true in order to be good. We will analyse their main argument for this claim (which goes under the name of 'no miracles argument'), and some prominent objections to it. Scientific antirealists, on the other hand, defend the view that there is nothing special about 'truth' and that scientific theories and scientific progress can be understood without appeal to it. The aim of this session is to present both views, their main arguments, and prospects....
Reading
7 vídeos (Total de 29 min), 2 leituras, 1 teste
Video7 videos
Saving the Phenomena? Ptolemeic Astronomy5min
Truth? Galileo and Copernican Astronomy2min
Scientific Realism and the No Miracles Argument3min
Scientific Anti-Realism: Constructive Empiricism7min
Realist Rejoinders: Inference to the Best Explanation5min
Concluding Summary2min
Reading2 leituras
Module: Are Scientific Theories True?10min
Related work by Philosophy staff at the University of Edinburgh10min
Quiz1 exercício prático
Practice: Are Scientific Theories True?16min
Horas para completar
20 minutos para concluir

Week 4 review

...
Reading
1 teste
Quiz2 exercícios práticos
Minds, Brains and Computers20min
Are Scientific Theories True?20min
4.6
Direcionamento de carreira

31%

comecei uma nova carreira após concluir estes cursos
Benefício de carreira

83%

consegui um benefício significativo de carreira com este curso

Melhores avaliações

por LTSep 2nd 2015

I thoroughly enjoyed this course and find that it encouragingly sets some directions, and of course, raises my excitement for further study into some of the different fields of philosophy. Thank you.

por CCOct 8th 2015

Great explanations that is broken down with examples for understanding. Quizzes test for your understanding of the topic rather than just the textbook explanations. Challenging and thought revoking.

Instrutores

Avatar

Dr. Dave Ward

Lecturer in Philosophy
University of Edinburgh
Avatar

Professor Duncan Pritchard

Professor of Philosophy
University of Edinburgh
Avatar

Professor Michela Massimi

Full Professor
Philosophy
Avatar

Dr. Suilin Lavelle

Lecturer in Philosophy
University of Edinburgh
Avatar

Dr. Matthew Chrisman

Reader in Philosophy
Philosophy
Avatar

Guy Fletcher

Lecturer
Philosophy
Avatar

Elinor Mason

Senior Lecturer
Philosophy

Sobre The University of Edinburgh

Influencing the world since 1583, The University of Edinburgh is consistently ranked as one of the world's top 50 universities. Today, we are an established and global leader in online learning, providing degree-level education to 3,000 online students in addition to 36,000 students on-campus. We also offer a wide range of free online courses in a variety of subjects. To find out more about studying for one of our online degrees, search for ‘Edinburgh online’ or visit www.ed.ac.uk/studying/online-learning/postgraduate ...

Perguntas Frequentes – FAQ

  • Ao se inscrever para um Certificado, você terá acesso a todos os vídeos, testes e tarefas de programação (se aplicável). Tarefas avaliadas pelos colegas apenas podem ser enviadas e avaliadas após o início da sessão. Caso escolha explorar o curso sem adquiri-lo, talvez você não consiga acessar certas tarefas.

  • Quando você adquire o Certificado, ganha acesso a todo o material do curso, incluindo avaliações com nota atribuída. Após concluir o curso, seu Certificado eletrônico será adicionado à sua página de Participações e você poderá imprimi-lo ou adicioná-lo ao seu perfil no LinkedIn. Se quiser apenas ler e assistir o conteúdo do curso, você poderá frequentá-lo como ouvinte sem custo.

Mais dúvidas? Visite o Central de Ajuda ao Aprendiz.