Comentários e feedback de alunos de Teoria de Jogos II: Aplicações Avançadas da instituição Universidade de Stanford
Sobre o curso
Melhores avaliações
This was a wonderful and very mathematically intensive course, but completing all the quizzes gave a great sense of accomplishment and developed my understanding of game theory and its various facets.
Very interesting! One missing thing: please write explanations for correct/incorrect questions in quizzes. In the basic course, I found them very helpful in understanding why my reasoning was wrong.
76 — 97 de 97 Avaliações para o Teoria de Jogos II: Aplicações Avançadas
por Matthew W
•A lot of the important results were covered but sometimes results came out of nowhere (for example with optimal auctions and virtual valuations).
por R.Athindran
•Overall, the course was good. Somehow, the concepts were not as clear as the basic game theory course. Definitely more advanced.
por Ryan B
•A good class with a good formal description and examples of game theoretic concepts.
por Koa Y
•Great course, I was really overdue but am hoping to get a certificate if possible
por Affandi I
•Great course, but I think It could be more vivid like its predecessor
por Roland R
•Great Course, same parts are challenging but i learned a lot about
por Hushan J
•it's better to give explanations of the quiz when it is passed.
por Daniel A M S
•It was nice to have a second part with more specific subjects.
por Arshia S
•This course gave me amazing insight into game theory.
por Muhua X
•It is very challenging but also interesting
por carlo p
•Excellent skills obtained
por Mufizul I
•Very nice
por Fred V
•Auction theory is left to the last lecture, and the influence of voting systems on political mechanisms is barely addressed. 3 different people lecturing, with different communication skills and flaws (hesitations, over-notating, abuse of acronyms), make following the course more difficult than it needs to be. These being said, it is clear that the authors more than know their stuff (at least the theoretical part; we would like to see them perform when bargaining in a souk) and bring a lot into the course.
por Cigdem K
•The exams did not explain why the wrong answers are wrong. Even after you succeed a test, I expect an explanation of the questions, and the correct answers. Even if I have a correct answer to a question, I don't know if my reasoning is correct..
por Telmo J P P
•Interesting, but not as good as part I. Some parts of the syllabus were not explained well enough: a lot of results just come out of thin air, and not a lot of intuitions are given.
por Emil
•Diverse course, which covered various topics. For the election processes however one could some illegal practices, which also could lead to a win. A democratic win...
por Martín B
•Should have much more real examples. Voting schemes was right, but mechanism design was completely abstract
por Carlos F S T
•No es tan bueno como el primero. Sin embargo, tomarlo como continuación es interesante.
por Jeppe v P
•Interesting material, but sometimes hard to follow the lectures.
por Edmund L
•The beginning of this course was interesting much like Game Theory I, but the latter half of the course went over my head. It would have been helpful if problem sets and exam are given explanations after submission similar to how it was done in Game Theory I. Sometimes I have no idea how particular answers are obtained.
por Prabhupad B
•No proper explanations were given for any of the assignment questions, and also, in the lectures, the examples were missing. The course needs a significant improvement in terms of the content
por Mohammad Z
•poorly explained lectures. you're better off reading a textbook
Coursera Footer
