[SOUND] Welcome. This is the third video in our module on game theory. In the first one philosophy professor Duhamel addressed playfulness and the inexplicable link between play and culture. In the second video, I discussed the psychological functions of play and how rewards contribute to the appeal of gaming. Now, I aim to deepen the psychological analysis of why people like to play. Let me start with the question, why people choose to play a game in the first place. The decision to spend time on gaming, rather than on, for example. Television viewing, a hobby, school, or work can be understood as a kind of motivated action. Two theoretical traditions have been drawn upon in the investigations of why people play digital games. I will first discuss the uses and gratification theory and next, self-determination theory. Uses and gratification theory, developed within media research by Greenberg, Sherry, and Ruggiero, holds that people use media to obtain gratifications which are related to the individual's needs. The theory emphasises that media users actively seek particular media content. In order to satisfy their needs. In the case of digital games, the active role of their users is beyond doubt. Games can function only if players respond to the messages appearing on the screen. If they do not push the buttons, the game simply stops. Empirical research has shown that particular games or genres are indeed chosen to satisfy specific needs. I will briefly discuss the seven motivations that were established in research. The first one is control. The virtual world of a game is appealing because it allows players to act as agents exerting control over the game character and its context. For example, in The Sims where the player is in charge of a complete household. It should be noted, however, that control is never total. Players are confronted immediately with the limits of their command when they make a mistake. The second motivation is challenge. Players like to push themselves to attain a higher level of skill. Challenge is often linked to a third motivation, competition. It refers to a need to win or surpass others. Generally sports and action games are the most competitive, but playing a simulation game may also satisfy this need. For example, when one is able to finish levels that one's friends can not. The fourth motivation is fantasy. It was found that gaming is attractive because it enables the player to engage in a variety of acts that will be difficult, or even impossible, to perform in our own lives. It's particularly prominent in games offering an alternative adventurous game world where players are engaged in role playing, like final fantasy. One of the conclusions from our own research is that players often fuse the adventurous game world to test their own behaviors and emotions. In other words, the game comes to function as a kind of safe laboratory. Interest is motivation number five. It refers to an urge to explore the game in detail and gather information about it. Control, challenge, competition, fantasy, and interest are directional kinds of motivations. The sixth motivation is less directional. Players often feel a need to play because they seek diversion, using the game to take their minds off their usual concerns by doing something completely different. The seventh and final motivation is social interaction. People like to play with each other, and against each other. This is obviously the case when people seek to play multiplayer games online such as the immensely popular World of Warcraft. But research has also shown that single player games are often played in the company of siblings, peers, or friends. The second theory explaining motivations to play is self determination theory or in short SDT. It was developed by psychologists Deci and Ryan. It holds that human behavior is determined by the interplay of three basic psychological needs, autonomy, competence and relatedness. Autonomy refers to the desire to self-organize experience and behavior. Competence is the need for challenge and the experience of ones effectiveness. Relatedness refers to the need to experience connections to other people. SDT researchers, Ryan, Rigby, and Pryzbylsi have established that gaming indeed satisfies autonomy needs. Players like to be in charge. Competence is satisfied as well, in particular by the challenges included in games. Finally, players satisfy their need for relatedness by engaging themselves with other players. Additionally, autonomy, competence and relatedness have been found to work as good predictors of persistence in play. That is the continuation of play despite the unavoidable frustrations. Obviously, self determination theory and uses and gratification theory have a lot in common. For example, autonomy is close to U and G's control motivation, competence is similar to challenge, and a need for relatedness is equivalent to social interaction. The obvious difference is that SDT purposefully concentrates on three basic needs, where U and G includes a larger set of motivations. By reducing all possible motivations to three basic ones, self determination theory aims to be applicable to many different situations, thus increasing the theories predictive power. Using gratification by contrast, is more concerned with describing the diversity of needs people seek to satisfy by playing a digital game. It is time to conclude. The popularity of gaming underlines the fact that many people are motivated to invest a lot of time to experience the pleasures of playing digital games. Thus far, the research based on use and gratification theory and self-determination theory was largely concerned with explaining the appeal of digital entertainment games. Conceivably, serious games could satisfy needs as well, for example, by offering diversion, the sense of control, or catering for needs concerned with competence, challenge, or interest. It also seems very well possible to design a serious game that satisfies competitive or social motivations. In the next video we will present the case, From 5 to 4. The game has been developed by Organiq in Rotterdam and is concerned with changing commuter habits. You will be informed about how the game developers have taken the possible motivations of players into account. Let's have a look.
