Episode 67. Thanks to the previous two sections, we are now equipped with some basic definitions of the terms religion and science. In this new section, We're going to explore the various models and relationships between the two. It's worth pointing out, there's not just one relationship between science and religion, but in fact, there is a wide spectrum of relationships. So as you proceed through this section, you're going to be able to start constructing your own personal view of how science and religion can relate to one another. With every new section of the course, we begin with some key thoughts which will reappear throughout section. Key Thought Number One. Regrettably, warfare is the common perception of the relationship between science and religion. As we noted previously, in the definition of religion section on page 30 of the notes, 59 percent of Americans believe science and religion are often in conflict. But thankfully, science-religion scholarship has moved well beyond the warfare. Key Thought Number Two. The foundation of science-religion scholarship reflects the metaphysics-physics principle. There are basically two steps involved in developing a peaceful relationship between science and religion. The first step, is to distinguish the fundamental differences between science and religion. Science deals with the physical world, while religion deals with the metaphysical world. In particular, science-religion scholarship is emphatic that we first need to separate science from religion in order that we don't conflate them together. The second step in science-religion scholarship, is to look for points in common for a reciprocal relationship between science and religion. And from there, we can develop a healthy relationship between the two. Lastly, Key Thought Number Three, is to recognize that science and religion scholarship is a young academic discipline. It only emerged during the 1990s, and as a consequence, it is still in the process of developing. In this section, we will focus on the two founding scholars, Ian Barbour and John Haught, because they were instrumental in laying the foundational ideas in science and religion. To begin, let's consider the science-religion model of John Haught. John Haught's 1995 book, Science and Religion: From Conflict to Conversation, is one of the finest introductions to developing a peaceful relationship between science and religion. It's worth noting, that Haught, is a Roman Catholic theologian. In the opening pages of his book, Haught outlines his model of science and religion. It's important to note, a model includes as many relationships as possible, including those we do not accept. Haught's model features four relationships between science and religion: conflict, contrast, contact and confirmation. Haught then presents his position on science and religion. It is necessary to distinguish this from a model. A position is a personal and specific view of the relationship between science and religion. In this case, Haught rejects conflict, then starts with contrast, and finally, integrates contact and confirmation. In Quote One, Haught explains his position on science and religion. The contrast approach, while perhaps a necessary first step, away from both conflation and conflict, is also unsatisfying. I think that the contact approach supplemented by that of confirmation, provides the most fruitful and reasonable response that has held so many scientists away from an appreciation of religion, and an even larger number of religious people from enjoying the discoveries of science. Here's a tip, do what John Haught does, select and combine his four relationships to develop your personal position on science and religion. Let's look at John Haught's model of science and religion in more detail. The first relationship is conflict. This is the common perception of the relationship between science and religion. This view asserts that it is impossible to be both religious and scientific, especially, if you're honest or not crazy. According to this relationship, science and religion are completely irreconcilable. Therefore, they are in a constant and never ending conflict. Haught points out, that this conflict is fueled by two groups. First, the scientific skeptics; and second, the Biblical literalists. In the next episode, we'll examine these two groups in more detail. End of episode.