How We Study the Pre-Socratics

Loading...

Do curso por University of Pennsylvania

Ancient Philosophy: Plato & His Predecessors

703 classificações

University of Pennsylvania

Ancient Philosophy: Plato & His Predecessors

703 classificações

What is philosophy? How does it differ from science, religion, and other modes of human discourse? This course traces the origins of philosophy in the Western tradition in the thinkers of Ancient Greece. We begin with the Presocratic natural philosophers who were active in Ionia in the 6th century BCE and are also credited with being the first scientists. Thales, Anaximander, and Anaximines made bold proposals about the ultimate constituents of reality, while Heraclitus insisted that there is an underlying order to the changing world. Parmenides of Elea formulated a powerful objection to all these proposals, while later Greek theorists (such as Anaxagoras and the atomist Democritus) attempted to answer that objection. In fifth-century Athens, Socrates insisted on the importance of the fundamental ethical question—“How shall I live?”—and his pupil, Plato, and Plato’s pupil, Aristotle, developed elaborate philosophical systems to explain the nature of reality, knowledge, and human happiness. After the death of Aristotle, in the Hellenistic period, Epicureans and Stoics developed and transformed that earlier tradition. We will study the major doctrines of all these thinkers. Part I will cover Plato and his predecessors. Part II will cover Aristotle and his successors.

Na lição

The Milesians & Heraclitus

Thales, Anaximander, Anaximenes and Xenophanes seek the material principle of the cosmos, and arrive at a radical new conception of the gods. Heraclitus distills the essence of their “naturalism” in his riddling slogans.

How We Study the Pre-Socratics4:16

Fragments and Sources4:51

Philosophers or scientists?7:28

The Material Principle5:07

God in Nature?5:58

Conheça os instrutores

Susan Sauvé Meyer
Professor
Department of Philosophy

[MUSIC]

We begin with the group of Greek thinkers who have come to be

called the Pre-Socratics.

These include Thales, Anaximander, Anaximines, Heraclitus,

Parmenides, and Anaxagoras.

Now don't worry if many of these names are unfamiliar, and

even if some of them sound alarmingly alike.

I'd like to start by addressing a more pressing problem we face

in studying these thinkers.

Quite simply, we don't have any of the books that they wrote.

The pre-Socratics were active in the 6th and

5th centuries BCE, about two and a half millenia ago.

Their writings were well-known and influential in their own day and

even in subsequent centuries, but

unfortunately these works haven't survived to the present day.

Except in quotations and paraphrases from later writers.

You'll see, for example, that virtually all of our information

about Thales comes from Aristotle, who lived centuries after he did.

And for Anaximander and Anaximines], as well as for other pre-Socratics,

our sources are even later.

An example of such a source is Hyppolytus of Rome, a Christian bishop

in the third century CE, about 800 years after Thales, and

he wrote a book called The Refutation of all Heresies.

Hyppolytus's project in that book was to refute

all the pagan philosophy of the Greeks.

So he's hardly a fair-minded reporter.

But as historians of philosophy,

we have to take what we can get in the way of evidence.

And Hippolytus may be a hostile source, but he is still a source.

He regularly quotes from the philosophers he's trying to refute, and for

that I'm eternally grateful.

Now if the irony of all ironies,

the Refutation ended up being one of the most important vehicles for

the preservation and dissemination of the philosophies that he set out to discredit.

So go figure that.

So before we can begin to study pre-Socratic philosophy,

we need to reconstruct these lost works or at least as much of them as we can

from reports like those in Aristotle and in Hippolytus.

Now in this reconstruction project, we are like archaeologists,

who are excavating the ruins of an ancient temple.

Little of the original structure is left standing,

most of it's fallen down in pieces, many of these pieces have been destroyed or

carried away by scavengers or collectors.

Some of them may be in the British Museum.

Still, archeologists try to reconstruct what the original

building was like from the pieces that remain.

As well as from reports from people who traveled to the site when it was intact

and wrote down a description of what they saw.

So that's the sort of reconstruction project that we are engaged in

when we investigate the philosophy of the pre-Socratics.

Now, the good news is that a lot of this reconstruction project has already been

done by classical scholars over the last two centuries.

We may call this the recovery phase of the project, in which the surviving

pieces of the original building have been gathered together in one location.

Those locations are our source books.

Now the next step is to reassemble the pieces to reconstruct the original

building.

Now the bad news is that in the case of pre-Socratic texts,

we don't have all the pieces of the original.

And in some cases, hardly any of them.

So it's a matter of interpretation, hypothesis, and conjecture.

To figure out what the whole edifice looked like.

That's the exciting project that we will be engaged in.

We are going to study these fragmentary remains and partial evidence and

try to figure out how they all fit together into a whole.

In this case, not a whole building, but a whole text or a whole philosophy.

Explore nosso catálogo

Registre-se gratuitamente e obtenha recomendações, atualizações e ofertas personalizadas.

O Coursera proporciona acesso universal à melhor educação do mundo fazendo parcerias com as melhores universidades e organizações para oferecer cursos on-line.

© 2018 Coursera Inc. Todos os direitos reservados.

Baixar na App Store

Baixar no Google Play