Lecture Version of "What is the Pie?"

Loading...

Do curso por Yale University

Introdução à negociação: um livro de estratégias para se tornar um negociador persuasivo e com princípios

1227 classificações

Yale University

Introdução à negociação: um livro de estratégias para se tornar um negociador persuasivo e com princípios

1227 classificações

This course will help you be a better negotiator. Unlike many negotiation courses, we develop a framework for analyzing and shaping negotiations. This framework will allow you to make principled arguments that persuade others. It will allow you to see beneath the surface of apparent conflicts to uncover the underlying interests. You will leave the course better able to predict, interpret, and shape the behavior of those you face in competitive situations. In this course, you will have several opportunities to negotiate with other students using case studies based on common situations in business and in life. You can get feedback on your performance and compare what you did to how others approached the same scenario. The cases also provide a setting to discuss a wide-ranging set of topics including preparing for a negotiation, making ultimatums, avoiding regret, expanding the pie, and dealing with someone who has a very different perspective on the world. Advanced topics include negotiating when you have no power, negotiating over email, and the role of gender differences in negotiation. To close out the course, we will hear insights from three negotiation experts: Linda Babcock, Herb Cohen, and John McCall MacBain. Enjoy.

Na lição

Acknowledgments and Further Readings

Lecture Version of "What is the Pie?"2:47

Lecture Version of Week 141:56

Conheça os instrutores

Barry Nalebuff
Milton Steinbach Professor
Yale School of Management

We do our negotiations today, everything is gonna be open,

all the cards are gonna be on the table.

There's gonna be no lying, bluffing, because everybody knows everything.

And we're gonna do that so as to illustrate the pie.

In our first problem, we have Alice and

Bob who are trying to divide up something of size 9.

The question is how much should Alice get and how much should Bob get?

In order to answer that,

we first have to say what they would get if they don't reach an agreement.

What we'll argue is that Alice will get 1 and Bob will get 2.

With that as the background, my question to you is,

how much of the nine do you think Alice will get compared compared to Bob?

>> Alice gets four.

>> Alice gets four and Bob gets five.

Any other choices?

>> Four and a half.

>> Four and a half.

>> 3 and 6. >> 3 and 6.

Show of hands.

How many people go with 3 and 6?

How many people go with four and a half, four and a half?

And how many people go with four and five?

Actually, it's almost a third, a third,

a third between that, which is kind of interesting.

So it says that we don't necessarily have consensus on what is a fair outcome or

what is an expected outcome here.

So let's start with this notion of what's the pie in this case.

And my view is that we're not really trying to divide up nine,

what we really have to divide up is six.

In the sense that if they don't reach an agreement, Alice is gonna get 1 and Bob is

gonna get 2 and so that three is already taken care of, it's not on the table.

The reason we're having this negotiation is to go from 3 to 9 or

to get the extra 6.

Who is needed more to get that 6, Alice or Bob?

>> [INAUDIBLE] >> Alice because she's behind but

if Bob says no, what happens to that 6?

>> [INAUDIBLE] >> Well no, if Bob says no.

>> [INAUDIBLE] >> Then they go to the 1 and 2.

So in order to go from the 1 plus 2, all the way up to the 9, who is needed more,

Alice or Bob?

>> Equal.

>> I think they're equally needed because if either party says no, it takes two

hands to get a handshake, and so if either party says no, that 6 disappears.

Therefore, how should that 6 be divided up, 3 and 3?

If we do that, what it means is that Alice gets 4 and Bob gets 5.

I think once you see things in the context of the pie,

then figuring out how to divide it up isn't so hard.

Now what I want you to do is to use that principle as we apply it to more realistic

and more interesting problems.

So that's it, that's the theory of the pie.

It is what people get by working together

compared to what they get if they don't reach an agreement.

Okay.

Explore nosso catálogo

Registre-se gratuitamente e obtenha recomendações, atualizações e ofertas personalizadas.

O Coursera proporciona acesso universal à melhor educação do mundo fazendo parcerias com as melhores universidades e organizações para oferecer cursos on-line.

© 2018 Coursera Inc. Todos os direitos reservados.

Baixar na App Store

Baixar no Google Play