Perspectives: Is the quality and reliability of our assessments robust enough to make high stake decisions?

Loading...

Do curso por Erasmus University Rotterdam

Assessment in Higher Education: Professional Development for Teachers

16 classificações

Erasmus University Rotterdam

Assessment in Higher Education: Professional Development for Teachers

16 classificações

Are you a teacher in higher education wanting to get the best out of your students and assessments? Then on behalf of Risbo, Erasmus University Rotterdam, we would like to welcome you to this MOOC on Assessment in Higher Education. In this MOOC we will guide you through the different phases of preparing, creating and evaluating the assessments in your course. After participating in this MOOC, you will be able to: 1. Design an assessment that is constructively aligned (content, level, methods) with the course objectives and activities 2. Apply the quality criteria with respect to validity, reliability and transparency for construction of assessments and assessment items 3. Analyze the assessment output and results, assess the quality of the assessment and make decisions about students’ grades accordingly 4. Formulate future improvements for an assessment For the assignments, you will be working with your own teaching materials. For example you will create your own assessment plan for your course. Next to that you will become part of a learning community with teachers from all over the world. We are offering you instructional videos, interviews, animations and checklists. In addition to these, there will be course activities, such as assessments, and discussion prompts. By participating in this MOOC, you will find answers to the following questions: • What is the role of assessment? • How can you select the right methods of assessment for your course? • What is constructive alignment? • How can an assessment plan and matrix help you in the construction of assessments? • Is it possible to make an absolute reliable and valid assessment? • How can the formulation of good assessment questions have an impact on that? • What is the role of feedback? • How can rubrics help with providing feedback? • What are the things to consider when performing an exam or item analysis? What aspects should you look out for? • How do you draw conclusions from an exam analysis and make plans for future improvements? • If good students fail on certain questions, what does this say about the question… or about your teaching? Are you ready for enhancing your teaching skills? Then take this journey with us.

Na lição

The role of assessment in higher education

In the first week of this course you’ll get insight in some basic but fundamental questions about assessment. Why do we assess in higher education? What are possible positive and negative effects of assessment? And in what way can we make an effort in choosing the most appropriate assessment method(s). Some leading experts on assessment are introduced to you and might enlighten your thoughts. Additionally, you will be introduced to the Utility formula, which will assist you in making purposeful assessment choices.

Perspectives: Why do we assess in higher education?6:55

Perspectives: What influence do grades have in assessment systems?9:00

Perspectives: How can assessment help in engaging students?11:04

Perspectives: Is the quality and reliability of our assessments robust enough to make high stake decisions?9:40

Perspectives: Is group assessment a desirable option in higher education?9:45

Conheça os instrutores

Marit Nieuwenhuys
Educational Advisor
Risbo
Remy Fermont
Educational Advisor
Risbo
Mandy Hollander
Educational Advisor
Risbo
Kris Stabel
Educational Advisor
Risbo
Sanne van Herpen
Educational Advisor
Risbo
Berry Nijveld
Educational Advisor
Risbo

Is the quality or reliability of our assessment

robust enough to make high stakes decisions,

and how could we secure the quality in order to make the right decisions?

I think the quality of assessments is defined at various levels actually.

So the first level is that you should

have a good assessment program within your curriculum.

You should think about,

what does the workplace ask for my students?

And then, how should I design my curriculum?

And how do they come into the program to

what do you want them to know and be able to do when they go out of the program?

And how do I then put in different assessment forms within that program?

Then at another level say,

the course level or medium program level,

it is actually that you should align

both or our three things and meet the learning goals.

What should students learn in a given phase, or a given program,

or a given course with the educational format you use with it.

And the education, and the resources that you

provide students in the training, in the lectures,

or whatever, and the assessment they should be aligned.

And there's quite a few theories say,

well, they should be aligned.

If they're not aligned you have a non-functioning program.

And there's always one thing that happens then.

Students they tend to look at the assessment,

what is the bottom line that I need to do?

And they will do that. And the rest will not function very properly.

And then while the lowest layer will be,

you can have this nice programming and you have this nice alignment,

then the devil is in the details.

Within assessment, the weakest link defines actually the strength of the whole thing.

So you can have very well suited,

very well valid multiple choice exams,

but if you put in bad questions,

it's still a poor exam,

though it might be very valid to do a multiple choice exam.

It can be very valid that you have a project in your curriculum.

But if the task of the project is not very well-defined,

if the judgment criteria are not very well-defined,

if you do not look in how I can get the feedback within my student group,

or the tutor in the students, how do I use it?

Then it can still be a bad form of learning assessment.

So you should take care of the little details in everything that you do in assessment.

So these are the three main things I think.

I can also easily demonstrate to you that most of

our assessments in actual practice are simply unreliable.

So we take many false negative and false positive decisions.

And if we do that a lot which normally we do in the hurdles,

we stack those errors.

And what you then see is that your attrition will be problematic.

You have problems with your attrition.

So that's why it is important not to take decisions either,

or if you take decisions,

to have a bit of compensation across different methods of assessment.

So should teachers be trained in that to make a professional judgment?

Definitely, definitely. Well, to be more specific,

teachers should be trained in how to give feedback.

And learners should be trained on how to give feedback.

So giving and receiving feedback,

to me is a learning outcome.

Fortunately enough, if you have a multiple choice exam,

it's not that students fail on one question in the exam which was poorly designed,

it's because they failed on the other half of

the questions which were well-designed which they did not answer correctly.

So yes, it's fortunate that in

an MCE exam there is not one question but there's like 40 or 50,

so that's the reason to put in 50 questions for example.

The same is true for say,

a year one of a curriculum.

So if a student fails on exam one because it was poorly designed,

fortunately, there's exam two,

and exam three, and exam four.

So it all compensates with one another.

And that is needed because each exam

is a compromise which I already told in time and money,

but also it's error prone.

Not a single measurement instrument is without any error,

and our instruments have a lot of error actually.

So we should expect it to be there.

And a lot programs don't compensate their assessment lecturer?

Yes, that is true.

And people feel strongly about this.

They say, well, we cannot do with compensation, which conjunction in this case.

But for the longer run,

being able to perform well in the workplace,

well, it doesn't matter.

And if you have a non-compensating curriculum,

actually it's very sad for your students and for yourself because

you check out too many students which

would be very well suited for their domain eventually.

So making sure that you don't compensate apples and oranges,

it's very well doable.

But it's feels counter-intuitive to do it.

I am actually in favor of a concept called programmatic assessment.

And in programmatic assessment,

we see every individual assessment as one data point.

And I can easily demonstrate to you that

any individual assessment has a number of poor qualities,

will never be perfect, will be far from perfect.

Therefore in programmatic assessment,

we take one assessment only as one data point.

And that data point is optimized for its learning function to the students,

so we provide feedback.

And then we take away the decision making from an individual data point, right?

Yes.

Because we actually say that,

and I can prove that,

that this individual data point,

this information is not sufficient enough to take a decision.

So let's remove the decision and focus entirely

on providing meaningful information to the learner.

It shouldn't be a hurdle.

It shouldn't be a hurdle, it should be a moment of feedback.

And I call that low stake, right?

Yeah, yeah.

Then if you have an education program,

you have a number of these data points.

And then naturally at some point in time,

there should be some decisions being made about progress.

But the heaviness or

the stake of the decision really depends also on the number of data points you.

If you have a lot of data points,

and if the emerging picture is clear,

then you can take decisions, but not before that.

So in programmatic assessment,

you have a lot of different data points,

a lot of different methods of assessment as well,

you want a lot of variability in that because you want your learners

to orally defend themselves over here,

to write over there,

to do a project over there.

So you want variability in the format.

All of that will have feedback attached to it

and that will be used ultimately also for decision making.

I think you can have a very nicely designed program of assessment in your curriculum,

but if the practical execution is bad,

then the whole thing also fails.

So we should put in more effort in carefully designing assessment tasks,

carefully designing the MC questions are open-ended questions,

carefully designing project tasks,

carefully designing judgment schemas,

there we could improve a lot actually.

So quality of the instrument?

The quality of the instruments can be quite heavily improved I think.

But I think what we see currently in higher education is these qualifications,

teaching qualifications, assessment being part of that.

So I think we're moving into a better direction.

So I think that we slowly will have more experts.

There's even a Master's program on assessment currently.

So you spend a year full-time on developing your assessment expertise.

So slowly I think things are changing.

And in the end every teacher will be [inaudible].

And hopeful of it.

Because in my view,

assessment and teaching should be merged as much as possible,

should not be distinct

from each other because that's asking for trouble. That's asking for trouble.

Explore nosso catálogo

Registre-se gratuitamente e obtenha recomendações, atualizações e ofertas personalizadas.

O Coursera proporciona acesso universal à melhor educação do mundo fazendo parcerias com as melhores universidades e organizações para oferecer cursos on-line.

© 2018 Coursera Inc. Todos os direitos reservados.

Baixar na App Store

Baixar no Google Play