Chevron Left
Voltar para Nutrição e Saúde - 营养与健康

Comentários e feedback de alunos de Nutrição e Saúde - 营养与健康 da instituição Universidade de Nanquim

4.4
estrelas
110 classificações
37 avaliações

Sobre o curso

《营养与健康》介绍营养学基础知识,主要内容包括:人体所需的七大营养素的化学结构、主要生理功能、食物来源、人体每天的参考摄入量等;主要食物种类包括谷物类、薯类、豆类、坚果类、蔬菜类、水果类、肉类、水产品类、蛋类、乳制品类的营养价值;营养与疾病特别是一些慢性、高发性疾病如高血糖、高血脂、高血压、癌症等的关系。内容简单,适合无营养学基础、但希望了解一般的营养学知识,改善日常膳食质量的人选修。...
Filtrar por:

26 — 36 de 36 Avaliações para o Nutrição e Saúde - 营养与健康

por 云终韵

4 de Mai de 2019

有些问题答案有错误

por Ruijia W

28 de Jan de 2019

Some of the knowledge may be out-of-date:

1. instead of BMI - body fat percentage, a recently more popular and reasonable measurement of health status - is not even mentioned in this course. In addition, it is believed that fat is distributed almost evenly in human body, thus the classification of "apple"/"pear" kind of fat are nonprofessional.

2: 胆固醇 - cholesterol is no longer a concern in diet as human body produce much more than we take from food. (https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/cholesterol-food-1.3394391; Cholesterol is not a nutrient of concern for overconsumption," the guideline now reads.)

Last, there are many detailed chemical expressions in the power points - not saying they are wrong - but I suspect any student will take note or memorize them. Therefore, less is more - replacing them with figures + a few bullet points of functions may improve efficiency.

General logic arrangement and content of this course is great, despite the old fashion lay-out and knowledge pieces.

por 王斯达

26 de Ago de 2015

课程中对营养素的摄入以及不同食物的营养价值的介绍非常有帮助,比如蛋白质的摄入跟其模式有关,而不仅仅与其氨基酸的含量有关,而禽类的营养价值比畜类要高;

一些常识也非常有用,比如体重指数BMI的计算,而且肥胖不仅仅要看BMI,还要看腰围;

不足之处是很多东西过于教科书化,比如人体每天摄入量的计算,各种维生素的作用等等,由于本人学习课程的目的更多是为了日常的实用性,所以建议不妨多加一些例子分析,让课程内容更加生动。

最后非常感谢郑老师的认真教学,谢谢您!

por Shao J

26 de Set de 2015

The course gives an general theoretical overview about nutrition, but not goes further into details or practical example.

por 姚瑶

4 de Fev de 2016

看了很多中国和国外的营养课程视频,发现中国老师大多是按部就班地讲课,比较死板,不容易理解和记忆。国外的课程比较生动,会结合政治、心理、社会等等以及引用大量的实例结合课程,比较容易记忆和理解。

por Randolph L

2 de Jun de 2017

怎么说呢,考试的课程对我而言的确是有些帮助的,但可能是课时限制的问题,感觉很多膳食营养的问题都没有提到,有些地方的专业名字又太过深奥,总体接纳的水平一般。

por sophie w

20 de Ago de 2020

课程是好东西,但是考试和课程不同步,又题太多。

por Sun Y

4 de Out de 2015

Some of the knowledge is useful in life. But they are not integrated well. They let you feel that they are just knowledge but you can hardly connect them with food, with daily life or with your health. The good knowledge teaching should be like how much calorie we need per day? how much food equal to 1000 calories? What is the good sample for eating or cooking? Knowledge is not only formula. This course is not that interesting. But, thanks for the teacher all the same.

por Sofia A A P

23 de Nov de 2015

No hay subtítulos en inglés ni español

por Kao C F

7 de Jul de 2020

亂七八糟

por 张朋帅

2 de Set de 2015

照本宣科