The course relied too much on excel demonstrations, so it was harder to keep track of concepts and take notes. Ok, but not great.

lectures were good , but was not sufficient enough to get the quiz answers. For that the video lectures need to be more thorough

I would like to be able to view the answers to the quiz questions that I answered incorrectly after I have passed the quiz.

Videos and Quizzes are great to introductions but modeling small examples on Excel would have helped anchor some notions.

Would prefer to have the actual excel template in order to have a first hand experience on how to apply the concepts.

Although the course content was good and helpful. A more detailed explanation would have helped provide more context.

Some of the answers to quiz needs specific text answers. I believe even though the answer is right, the quiz come out

Quiz's were more theoretical than practical, overall intermediate level and need prior basic knowledge of finance.

Bit of a large step between very simple weeks 1 and 2 and more complex weeks 3 and 4 but mostly easy to follow

course content is great, quizzes not so. Some questions are very confusing and needed further clarifications

I enjoyed the difficulty of the quizzes, but found that the material could've been explained in more detail.

Few tools on Xls has been shown.

More extensive and complex problem are required on use of Monte Carlo method

unlike the previous course this was more vague , its was not detailed enough to get a good comprehension.

Found the course a little ineffective. The wording of the questions were confusing and not clear at all.

more examples of the different topies would have been useful to solidy the kowledge newly learned topics

Slides did not add value. I prefer the slides summarizing the lecture so that I can keep them on file.

The videos were so short and not comprehensive and the quizzes were way hard compare to the materials

Module 2 specifically was really cut down in comparison to the quiz taken.

felt a little unstructured

Coverage seems less and test questions have some vaguely worded questions that get you confused.

It seems to me like the course could have like 2 or 3 times more video concerning tasks required

The course itself is interesting and can be done in 3-4 hours in total max. Slides are useless.

Wharton's online MD can not have a course so poorly develop (lectures vs quiz vs material)

It was a good course. The quizzes should be corrected since some questions are ambiguous.

In my opinion, this course is more information oriented rather than knowledge oriented.

A Good course, but there is a need for further expansion, especially in Week 3 and 4.