Oct 01, 2017
I have played around with Ruby on Rails before but this course really helped me understand the nots and bolts. It is worth replicating all the examples shown in the videos to get a good understanding,
Aug 07, 2016
One of the most challenging things I've ever done.\n\nThe course goes from zero to web deploy in 3 weeks and there are more to enjoy, discover and learn....\n\nTry it, I't's a no-return voyage
por Dhaval T•
Feb 22, 2016
Could've been much more clear with the examples if there were some loads of practice problems
por Marcel B•
Dec 22, 2019
Uses outdated Ruby version. Assignments rely on third-party APIs that have been shutdown.
por Xianglong W•
Jan 13, 2018
Lectures are really dull and boring compared to other coursed I have had.
por Miguel R T•
Apr 20, 2019
It's outdated, but the theory behind the course has been valuable to me.
por Raul C M•
Nov 22, 2015
I struggle sometimes with tests. But after all everything when was good
por Erick Q•
Jun 13, 2018
A handful of the examples in this course are outdated and do not work.
por Eduardo C•
Oct 22, 2015
Me gustaria que fuese mas interactivo al momento de explicar el codigo
por Frederick J•
Sep 24, 2016
This is a good course. A thorough introduction to ruby on rails.
por Kareem E•
Aug 24, 2016
The final module is vague , but the course is nice as a whole
por David P•
Dec 21, 2018
A bit out of date, should have a module to install rvm.
Sep 26, 2015
Very difficult to follow if you are not a programmer.
por Daniel H G•
Apr 18, 2016
it's ok. i would love more practical examples.
por Alexander K•
Jul 07, 2018
relatively good course, but has some issues
por Dinh T L H•
Dec 14, 2015
The voice is not good!
por Nabil A B G•
Nov 17, 2015
very short course.
por Deleted A•
Mar 21, 2016
por 에스더 이•
Feb 01, 2017
por Nicholas K•
Jul 09, 2016
Unfortunately as a course designed to teach Rails, it is poorly paced and has a few issues. The course content is spread out over three weeks as follows...
Week 1 they go over setting up a Ruby on Rails development environment, which was fine. They also went over Git and Github. While you can access all of the course content on Github, you are never actually required to use Git for any of the work in the course, and it only shows up as a few questions on the only quiz in the course.
Week 2 they cover Ruby programming and syntax. There are a lot of different sources where you can find tutorials and such for learning a new language, and in this course the material was... good enough. They also offered a number of practice assignments with self grading capability which is a nice feature.
The graded programming assignment for week 2 gives a lot of information about how to set up your environment and steps/commenting to assist building out your code. However there were a few requirements for the graded portion of the assignment that they don't even tell you about (expected return values under certain situations) until you actually run the grader. They weren't difficult but their reasoning were never explained in the course and it made the code a little more awkward than it needed be to pass.
Week 3 is where the major pacing problems occur. There are a number of very broad stroke videos on Rails, as well as several brief videos covering a number of third party libraries or tools sometimes required to build Rail apps. A lot of the content they cover isn't even utilized in the assignments of the course.
The week 3 assignment instructions are actually incomplete. They tell you a number of pre-required packages you have to install, including ones you had installed from previous assignments, but they leave out others you will need and leave several development environment issues you end up having to work out on your own.
And where as the week 2 assignment was almost overly hand-holdy on showing you where in a ruby file structure to implement your code, week 3 hardly offers any guidance on where or how to implement your Rails structure. The broad stroke videos from week 3 kind of give you an idea as to what each piece of code is doing if your working from a template, but the assignment feels obfuscated when trying to build it from scratch.
A major issue also comes from a third party website they require for completion of the assignment (and that requires separate registration to use). During several periods, over multiple sessions of the course, the third party site went down and was unavailable for as long as 48 hours at a time; during which it was impossible to properly run or debug the assignment due to its requirement.
What the assignment is asking for isn't even terribly difficult when you do understand what is required, and the code is rather simple and minimal to implement. But you end up having to figure out a lot of that either off site (in which case you are not learning from the course) or by modifying a copy paste of some of the templates/scaffolding from the course GitHub content, in which case you don't get a good reinforcement of the material.
In the end I wound up getting a certificate, feeling like I passed despite the course rather than because of it. There is some good foundation for a course in here, but it just falls apart in the third week and lacks any real depth.
por Melissa N•
Jun 27, 2016
Initially I thought this was a great course, but my optimism quickly dissipated. The homework assignments all required information that wasn't covered in the lectures, forcing hours of searching for answers. During the week, questions in the forums were answered within a day or so, but there was no help at all on the weekends. If I got stuck on a Friday night and couldn't find an answer myself, I had to wait until Monday to get a reply from an instructor or teaching assistant. For those who work during regular business hours and use their free time on the weekends to study, this course becomes nearly impossible to complete.
por Remco P•
Oct 07, 2015
I hate to write a negative review when the designers of the course have clearly put a lot of love and attention to detail into making it. But...
The quality of the code is bad. The quality of the testing code is even worse. This endeavours to teach some horrible practices. That's a shame, because the editing quality of the videos is excellent, the use of git and rspec is likewise commendable.
Even worse, it's not entirely clear who the target audience is. A lot of the topics introduced are aimed at complete novices, yet not explained in a way novices might understand. The course needs some serious rethinking and refactoring.
Mar 29, 2017
Definitely not for a beginner.
Wish there were more visuals, and assignments to do alongside the professor. Instead, it is a lecture from Power Points, that don't really line up with the assignments very well.
If you have previous knowledge in another language, you'll do fine, but if you're truly looking for a beginner course, look elsewhere. Many assumptions are made by this professor that makes it less approachable by a beginner, IMO.
por Wei J H•
Jun 26, 2017
This course is not suitable for beginner. I have basic knowledge on Ruby on Rails prior taking this course. Overall, it improve my understanding and knowledge on Ruby on Rails.
The materials need an update.
Programming is those skills you need constantly practicing, I hope the teaching style can be improved by providing more follow along video tutorial instead of lectures slides.
por Koukla K•
Jul 19, 2018
por A. l B•
Oct 23, 2016
Lacks of structure.
References multiple tools/programs "that we won't detail in this course" (... why are they talked about then ?).
I'm almost finished but am struggling to find motivation for it.
por Lucas N R•
May 02, 2016
This course should be revised. The material was lacking (just static images, no real time coding), overall engagement for the courses was also lacking The instructor sounded low quality and sometimes a bit hard to understand. I could no complete this course, unfortunately.