Chevron Left
Voltar para Programming Languages, Part B

Comentários e feedback de alunos de Programming Languages, Part B da instituição Universidade de Washington

4.9
estrelas
689 classificações

Sobre o curso

[As described below, this is Part B of a 3-part course. Participants should complete Part A first -- Part B "dives right in" and refers often to material from Part A.] This course is an introduction to the basic concepts of programming languages, with a strong emphasis on functional programming. The course uses the languages ML, Racket, and Ruby as vehicles for teaching the concepts, but the real intent is to teach enough about how any language “fits together” to make you more effective programming in any language -- and in learning new ones. This course is neither particularly theoretical nor just about programming specifics -- it will give you a framework for understanding how to use language constructs effectively and how to design correct and elegant programs. By using different languages, you will learn to think more deeply than in terms of the particular syntax of one language. The emphasis on functional programming is essential for learning how to write robust, reusable, composable, and elegant programs. Indeed, many of the most important ideas in modern languages have their roots in functional programming. Get ready to learn a fresh and beautiful way to look at software and how to have fun building it. The course assumes some prior experience with programming, as described in more detail in the first module of Part A. Part B assumes successful completion of Part A. The course is divided into three Coursera courses: Part A, Part B, and Part C. As explained in more detail in the first module of Part A, the overall course is a substantial amount of challenging material, so the three-part format provides two intermediate milestones and opportunities for a pause before continuing. The three parts are designed to be completed in order and set up to motivate you to continue through to the end of Part C. Week 1 of Part A has a more detailed list of topics for all three parts of the course, but it is expected that most course participants will not (yet!) know what all these topics mean....

Melhores avaliações

VA

18 de mar de 2018

This course (as Part A and C) is great - Dan is great in teaching and the content is perfect for anyone who wants to learn more about programming languages!

Warning - you might end up loving FP :)

AZ

23 de mar de 2018

Great course with really interesting and challenging assignments that allow to get more precise vision on programming languages (especially on PL's typing systems) and get experience with modern LISP

Filtrar por:

126 — 150 de 155 Avaliações para o Programming Languages, Part B

por 白旭

2 de fev de 2021

Can no be better!

por Adetokunbo A

24 de jan de 2020

Excellent course!

por Jürgen B

1 de set de 2019

Highly recommend.

por 郑

13 de dez de 2017

very good course!

por Wang G

13 de ago de 2019

Very good course

por Jin X

12 de set de 2018

Dan is so cool!

por 张家培

16 de mar de 2017

interesting!!!!

por Shaohao Z

20 de set de 2016

AMAZING COURSE!

por Sorin J

20 de ago de 2020

Outstanding!

por Dingze W

25 de jul de 2018

great course

por Fry

24 de set de 2017

very good!!!

por Sebastijan P

8 de mar de 2019

TOP course.

por Alejandro M

21 de nov de 2016

Excellent!

por 彭福伟

28 de set de 2016

wonderful

por Juspreet S

7 de fev de 2017

Awesome!

por Marc

18 de ago de 2020

Great !

por Devin

7 de dez de 2017

Great!

por shengrang

19 de dez de 2016

nice

por Dheimersão B E

13 de out de 2020

O

por Ivan T

24 de jun de 2017

G

por Gregory G

11 de jan de 2022

The MUPL exercise was hard. It involved writing a Racket interpreter for a made up programming language (MUPL).

por alfred

15 de jan de 2020

I think the course should be deeper and the assignment should be harder. Anyway, thanks for your effort!

por Atsushi

6 de jan de 2019

the course material was good! but the discussion forum was not so active.

por Deleted A

3 de out de 2016

Excellent course material. Homework is a bit esoteric though.

por 刘长通

27 de set de 2016

I learned a lot from this course, thank you.