this is by far an AMAZING in-depth course! i enjoyed every second of it. It's challenging in a way that makes you improve. TOTALLY RECOMMEND IT. Great work guys 👏 well done and thanks for the effort!
This is one of the Best Course available on Reinforcement Learning. I have gone through various study material but the depth and practical knowledge given in the course is awesome.
por Emilio P•
Wonderful course. Just would need a little bit more work on the subtitles.
por Anton P•
It still a beta:(
por Philippe M•
Notebooks are very useful to learn the theory and I certainly learned a lot throughout this course. However, codes in homework often lack of clarity and sometime includes errors and not enough assert checks. The audio is also hard to and understand, the slides are often poor, missing keywords, recaps, organization, sometimes you have 4 dense slides per lessons. Would be great to have better slides as a support of the speech. The questions during videos are really useful. The teaching staff is really reactive and many issues, difficulties have already been solved by the community, which helps a lot for autonomy. So thank you, it was really really useful, but it could have been better and cleaner !
por David D•
The content and structure of the course are great. However, its title is misleading, for in the whole course there only one "practical" assignment (translating He to En), and all other assignments were about Atari games or toy problems. This leads to disappointment, because the presentation of the course creates expectation of many real-world applications of RL, and they are not covered by the course.
por Kristoffer M•
The teachings are actually quite good, and the problem sets are fine, but there are so many bugs in the submission methods that you spend halv of your coding time trying to debug the submit methods. Frustrating. If they fix the course, this course will be highly recommended.
por Xiaoahe X•
The course is well organized. Reference and extra learning items is helpful to enhance the knowledge.
BUT! There are so many small bugs in the assignments that it really takes time to fix and make the course hard to get passed.
por Helmut G•
Sometimes it is hard to understand/follow the instructors. And the assignments (especially the grader) are bit too much beta, which causes a lot of extra effort.
por Felix A•
The course itself is great, but the assignments are a bit chaotic (so make sure to bring a lot of patience and willingness to bugfix)
Lectures are mathematical and theoretical.
Assignments are practical. NO EXPLANATION OF WHAT ASSIGNMENTS IN CLASS
por Dai T•
Lots of theory and definition should be illustrate in detail on ppt.
por Sylvain D•
por Anders A•
The collection of curriculum was great together with links to external resources. However, there was several weaknesses with the course. First, several of the assignments had problems with submitting the code, which required some extra coding to be able to submit assignment. Event with multiple weeks with many students reporting the problem, nothing was corrected. Second, the lectures were weak. I knew something about Q-learning from before, but after the lecture I was more confused than when I started. The topics I were not familiar from before the course,I ended up searching online or using the resources linked to instead of the lectures. The question exercises felt arbitrary and not helpful at all. The programming exercises were not well explained. I were able to finish them, but to much unnecessary annoyance.
por Maxim B•
Don't let Alexander Panin read lectures. He is an awful speaker: always in a hurry, uses so many redundant words in his speech. He "killed" so much interesting material in this course. I truly believe he could write cool lecture notes and handouts (currently the course lacks it). Alexander, please, write materials, don't read lectures.
por Raghu R•
Course is good. But too many grader issues. Accent is tough to understand sometimes. The concept is not built layer wise..Instead they dump it as a heap with tough jargon which had to broken down to be understood slowly by pausing..
por Arun A•
Instructors are difficult to understand. Assignment directions are not clear
por Amir N•
Awful accent of the instructure! His accent is not comprehensible by any means. I even didn't understand what he aimed on the first week. He was talking about something like integration and deravative for no reason and you could imagine all of the equations in your mind instead of him writing them on the board. Absolutely useless course. Due to a bug in Coursera.com, I can't cancel my subscription to this course. Definitely do not recommend it.
por Antony L•
Course not ready and has installation prerequisites. Seems to use a libraries (Docker, Env).
I waste too much of my time trying to install libraries and dependencies for online courses, most of which become obsolete within a year or two.
Additionally, the logic embedded within the library is often the thing I want to learn, and abstracting it only teaches me about the bugs and shortcomings of that library.
por Md. S I•
English pronounciation is difficult to understand.