Still good but getting much sloppier. Bad editing of the videos, some exercises plain wrong and staff not reacting to forum posts, etc.

Course materials need some cleanup. Were a number of audio blips, in the video. Material was good but just didn't seem as polished.

Too short on its own (took half a day to go through the whole thing), could have been combined with Course 2 of the specialization.

this session was good it would be more better if they provided the code of them..so that we could be abke to learn more from them

Felt a bit rushed, each video was full of good tips but personally I think each video should have been a jupyternotebook instead.

More theoretical than the other courses in the specialisation but still very high quality.

Short but with a lot of information.

Not nearly as good as the first two courses. These two weeks should probably be added into the second course at some point...

Would like more applied discussion and for it to be Longer. In particular I would like to see a discussion on class imbalance.

The content of this course is a bit too little for me.

However, it provides useful guidance for my projects. Much appreciated!

Not nearly as valuable as the first Deep Learning course. And the questions posed in the quizzes seemed far more subjective.

Programming practices with TensorFlow should have continued in this course. Unfortunately, these two weeks were all talking.

This course does discuss interesting and important subjects but I feel it can be combined with course 2 of this series

course is very good have a lot of important theory, it will be amazing if become 3 weeks with programming assignments.

lot of issues with assignments and ambiguous quiz questions this time around, not as polished as other Andrew courses

Could have more case studies and above all. Also programing assignments on self driving car could have been better

Overview of the machine learning process. No projects or sample code to actually organize the ideas into code.

To much talk but understandable. Need something like programming examples with different data distributions.

Seemed to be information that could have been included in another course rather than its own 2 week course.

Lectures can be summed up by: "use common sense".

Quiz can be summed up by "to pass, use OUR common sense".

The quiz questions are quite confusing and some of them are not consistent with the content of the videos.

Slightly repetitive from previous courses. Could have been integrated with the future or previous course.

More quizzes or scenario-based examples or exercises at the end in coding. This felt thin in content.

This course was shorter and didn't have any programming assignments. Could've been part of course 2.

Unfortunately, it did not match with my expectations, too much theory and no programming exercises.

The early part rather feels slow and repetitive. The course's content seems very important though.