While the information from this course was awesome I would've liked some hand on projects to get the information running. Nonetheless, the two simulation task were the best (more would've been neat!).
I learned so many things in this module. I learned that how to do error analysys and different kind of the learning techniques. Thanks Professor Andrew Ng to provide such a valuable and updated stuff.
Homework is lacking. It is too easy to pass. I feel like the programming task or homework task fell short. The lectures were good but too little practice.
por Hanbo L•
Good non-technical materials, but short enough to be incorporated into other courses. Some aspects feel subjective. Many typos/minor mistakes in quizzes
por vincent p•
Was really enthousiastic about the first two courses in the specialization, the third however felt a bit like going back a step in level of advancement.
por Rishabh G•
A different course for only two weeks of content? This is nuts. I waited for 15 days for financial aid to be approved and I completed it within 5 days.
por Leitner C S E S•
Only interesting if you don't have much experience with machine learning; Might or might not be great if you are a novice, though - hard to say for me.
por Deleted A•
There was some very valuable material. However, I think some of the videos could have been prepared a little bit better and could do with more editing
por Carsten F•
Course was less interesting than the other parts. Also very negative that the last part of the 5-part specialization is taking ages to be finalized.
por Dany J•
Good content, but could definitely benefit from a more fleshed out problem to solve. The content beg for a larger concrete coding exercice project.
por John J•
Appears to be some errors in the section titles (Flight Simulator??). Also, some parts didn't seem to be as polished as the previous two courses.
por Hernan J•
It's easy and more simple than the others in specialization. Can be more deeper into ML project organization management. It's ok, could be better!
por Jordon B•
This course did not contain programming assignments, only quizzes, and was thus considerably less useful, even though the knowledge was important.
Quite some questions are confusing and some are not correct itself. and this course is more concept based, didn't actually get to program a lot.
por Giacomo A•
Contains some useful tips, but they are a bit too diluted - I feel like it could have lasted much less and still conveyed the same information.
por Yancey S•
This course provides some interesting insights into how to approach machine learning projects, but feels a little light on substance at times.
por Even G•
Great content. Some strange audio that I think should've been cut (especially in week 2). I suspect the week 2 quiz is a little buggy as well.
por Mayur S•
The course material can be clubbed with existing courses. It would have been much more meaningful with some examples and hands-on assignments
por Rindra R•
Covered important topics and real-world project considerations. However, the content and assignments are too short to make it a full course.
por Daniel K•
This time it was not that well-structured than the previous courses. I thought we would learn how to structure step by step an ML project.
por José G•
Lots of information, few knowledge
Change name to "Struc. Deep Learning Projects", all other forms of ML not considered, specially for P2.
por Eric K•
Too much similar material to the prior course, and only two simple quizzes, no hands-on programming assignments like in earlier courses.
por Eric M•
A fundamentally very good course with a few technical gltiches that can be easily corrected and some confusing elements to be clarified.
por Bongsang K•
I think this lecture is important for every research scientist. However, there was no programming examples so I was confused sometimes.
por Michael L•
No programming assignments or labs, so too much theory, and too little chance to put same into practice. Not a good value for my money.
por Max S•
Still good but getting much sloppier. Bad editing of the videos, some exercises plain wrong and staff not reacting to forum posts, etc.