Chevron Left
Back to Global Systemic Risk

Learner Reviews & Feedback for Global Systemic Risk by Princeton University

4.7
stars
281 ratings

About the Course

What is globalization and how does it work? How can we understand the process as a whole? How are the parts of the world linked? What are the risks of living in a world where “no one is in charge”? This course introduces students to systems thinking, network theory, and risk analysis and uses these tools to better understand the process of globalization. Focusing on trade, finance, and epidemiology, it analyzes potential challenges to the current global order. The course will be of interest to those studying global affairs, system dynamics, and world governance. It offers a set of heuristics that students can use to analyze contemporary global challenges. Linking the recording of Abbey Road to the COVID-19 pandemic provides new insights into the apparently chaotic world around us. Complex systems form the backbone of our increasingly interconnected and interdependent society. What were once more localized economies, supply chains, and social-ecological systems are now rapidly globalizing, and interacting with one another across countless spatial and temporal scales as technologies expand at ever greater velocities. These tightly coupled systems deliver greater efficiency and prosperity, but at the cost of greater fragility and the threat of catastrophic failure. This “global systemic risk” has implications in all functional domains affecting our daily lives—from the global financial system to healthcare, to critical infrastructure networks. Organized with 7-10 minute classes grouped together into longer modules, the course will have a linear “core” curriculum presented at the introductory level, with the potential for optional offshoots that give learners a more in-depth look into certain areas with more technical content....

Top reviews

NL

Nov 3, 2021

A gret intro to Global Systemic Risk. I got a lot out of the course and would enjoy more on the matter. It also hasspurred me to do more research into the mathematics of systems for my own work.

DS

Feb 13, 2022

Our tutor made a complex field accessible, interesting and pleasant to engage with. I particulalry enjoyed the wealth of visuals, simplification of language and the interviews with specialists.

Filter by:

51 - 75 of 86 Reviews for Global Systemic Risk

By irit

Mar 5, 2022

This is an excelent course! I have learnt a lot

By Daniel H

Jan 21, 2022

Excellent overview of systemic risk management.

By J R

Mar 16, 2023

Um dos melhores que já fiz no COURSERA!

By Cynthia G

Apr 2, 2022

Hope you give certificates next time

By Jonas Z

Dec 21, 2023

great content, top tier lecturer

By Matheus V

Mar 11, 2024

Really good teacher and classes

By Julia A

Jan 18, 2023

Informative and facinating.

By Maciej T

Mar 2, 2023

interesting

perspective

By Sudarsan S

Mar 28, 2022

Excllent thoughts

By William T A

Jan 11, 2024

Fantastic course

By francisco j M

Mar 16, 2022

Muy interesante.

By Greg B

Jan 3, 2024

Great Course!!

By Tafadzwa M A C

Aug 23, 2023

Great course

By Rafael A R

Apr 14, 2023

Great Course

By Ankita S

Dec 25, 2022

nice course

By Sundar S N

Dec 7, 2022

Recommended

By Deleted A

Mar 1, 2024

Great Job!

By Lance L

Nov 1, 2023

!!!!!!!!!

By Anne-Marie A

Nov 11, 2021

Excellent

By Diego J P

Apr 10, 2024

Exelent

By Acevedo p v

Jun 9, 2023

Bueno

By suryakant

Sep 14, 2023

Yes

By Rahaf

Nov 30, 2022

a

By Mark A B

May 28, 2022

By Marion T

Sep 23, 2022

Much of the course material was directed at undergraduates in the US. That has advantages and disadvantages. Professor Centeno was engaging and competent, so hats off to him. He set out the definitions very well, but I do wish he had more global examples instead of using American High School society to illustrate the elements of a social system and networks. The COVID section is already out of date, so that will need revision.

Probably it is brave for an academic at Princeton U. to point out that globalisation has downsides, but for me the critical analyses were too still shallow. There were many downsides of globalisation that were either mentioned in passing but not considered in depth or not mentioned at all. For example the systemic effects of the 'human enterprise' as William Rees calls it, on the ecological systems is hardly covered. Also the depth, scope and persistence of human suffering that globalisation has brought and brings is not really on the 'menu'. The horrendous effects of global industry such as exponentially increased mining, the development and employment of 300 thousand chemicals that are mostly finding their way into the atmosphere, in landfills, i fresh water in the oceans with no regulation are just a few examples. I think it would be helpful to use the nine planetary boundaries developed by the Resilience Institute in Stockholm in this course, as the discipline of earth systems science provides their foundation. Also, the crossing of the BPs is a direct result of globalisation. Why are earth system science findings not included?

Also globalisation of industrial agriculture pollutes every ecosystem it touches and ruins the lives and livellhoods of small farmers, small fisherfolk, indigenous peoples and marginalised people who live in scarifice zones. These people and the ecosystems did not get much love or attention although the 'story' of globalisation cannt be told without including structures and patterns to achieve and maintain domination to have 'cheap labour, cheap energy, cheap food and cheap resources (Jason Moore).

The interviews were very insteresting some better than others. It would have been nice of the Prof had now and then asked a follow up question with a bit of bite, instead of only softball questions but I guess he was grateful to have the interviewees agree to talk to him.

The reading list seems OK but it is a shame that the discussion questions are always about personalisation and never about the reading. Including a few short texts or excerpts and asking some good questions or setting some exercises in relation to those texts would add a lot to the learning experience. Professor Centeno's article (with colleagues) on The emergence of global systemic risk from 2015 for example could have been usedin week one or week two. I added a reading list of my own for week 6 as there was none given. If you need me to send it again let me know. In that context why not offer us a chance to upload articles for others?

All in all the prof and team did a good job for a first venture into this difficult topic and I give them a lot of credit for the effort.